Java中如何高效测试字符串拼接性能?
- 内容介绍
- 文章标签
- 相关推荐
本文共计381个文字,预计阅读时间需要2分钟。
测试代码:public class StringJoinTest { public static void main(String[] args) { int count=10000; long begin, end, time; begin=System.currentTimeMillis(); testString(count); end=System.currentTimeMillis(); time=end - begin; System.out.println(时间: + time + 毫秒); } public static void testString(int count) { StringBuilder sb=new StringBuilder(); for (int i=0; i 测试代码:
public class StringJoinTest {
public static void main(String[] args) {
int count = 10000;
long begin, end, time;
begin = System.currentTimeMillis();
testString(count);
end = System.currentTimeMillis();
time = end - begin;
System.out.println("拼接" + count + "次,String消耗时间:" + time + "毫秒");
begin = System.currentTimeMillis();
testStringBuffer(count);
end = System.currentTimeMillis();
time = end - begin;
System.out.println("拼接" + count + "次,StringBuffer消耗时间:" + time + "毫秒");
begin = System.currentTimeMillis();
testStringBuilder(count);
end = System.currentTimeMillis();
time = end - begin;
System.out.println("拼接" + count + "次,StringBuilder消耗时间:" + time + "毫秒");
}
private static String testStringBuilder(int count) {
StringBuilder tem = new StringBuilder();
for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) {
tem.append("hello world!");
}
return tem.toString();
}
private static String testStringBuffer(int count) {
StringBuffer tem = new StringBuffer();
for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) {
tem.append("hello world!");
}
return tem.toString();
}
private static String testString(int count) {
String tem = "";
for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) {
tem += "hello world!";
}
return tem;
}
}
测试结果: 结论:
在少量字符串拼接时还看不出差别,但随着数量的增加,String+拼接效率显著降低。在达到100万次,我本机电脑已经无法执行String+拼接了,StringBuilder效率略高于StringBuffer。所以在开发过程中通常情况下推荐使用StringBuilder。
StringBuffer和StringBuilder的区别在于StringBuffer是线程安全的。
以上就是本文的全部内容,希望对大家的学习有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持易盾网络。
本文共计381个文字,预计阅读时间需要2分钟。
测试代码:public class StringJoinTest { public static void main(String[] args) { int count=10000; long begin, end, time; begin=System.currentTimeMillis(); testString(count); end=System.currentTimeMillis(); time=end - begin; System.out.println(时间: + time + 毫秒); } public static void testString(int count) { StringBuilder sb=new StringBuilder(); for (int i=0; i 测试代码:
public class StringJoinTest {
public static void main(String[] args) {
int count = 10000;
long begin, end, time;
begin = System.currentTimeMillis();
testString(count);
end = System.currentTimeMillis();
time = end - begin;
System.out.println("拼接" + count + "次,String消耗时间:" + time + "毫秒");
begin = System.currentTimeMillis();
testStringBuffer(count);
end = System.currentTimeMillis();
time = end - begin;
System.out.println("拼接" + count + "次,StringBuffer消耗时间:" + time + "毫秒");
begin = System.currentTimeMillis();
testStringBuilder(count);
end = System.currentTimeMillis();
time = end - begin;
System.out.println("拼接" + count + "次,StringBuilder消耗时间:" + time + "毫秒");
}
private static String testStringBuilder(int count) {
StringBuilder tem = new StringBuilder();
for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) {
tem.append("hello world!");
}
return tem.toString();
}
private static String testStringBuffer(int count) {
StringBuffer tem = new StringBuffer();
for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) {
tem.append("hello world!");
}
return tem.toString();
}
private static String testString(int count) {
String tem = "";
for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) {
tem += "hello world!";
}
return tem;
}
}
测试结果: 结论:
在少量字符串拼接时还看不出差别,但随着数量的增加,String+拼接效率显著降低。在达到100万次,我本机电脑已经无法执行String+拼接了,StringBuilder效率略高于StringBuffer。所以在开发过程中通常情况下推荐使用StringBuilder。
StringBuffer和StringBuilder的区别在于StringBuffer是线程安全的。
以上就是本文的全部内容,希望对大家的学习有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持易盾网络。

