A骚操作又来~~~砍额度???
- 内容介绍
- 文章标签
- 相关推荐
问题描述:
x.com
x.com
--【壹】--:
--【贰】--:
--【叁】--:
--【肆】--:
宕机也就算了,还砍额度有点过分了
Thariq
@trq212 Overall weekly limits stay the same, just how they're distributed across the week is changing. I know this was frustrating. We’re continuing to invest in scaling efficiently. I'll keep you posted on progress. 7:45 PM - 26 Mar 2026 890 11Thariq
@trq212 We've landed a lot of efficiency wins to offset this, but ~7% of users will hit session limits they wouldn't have before, particularly for pro tiers. If you run token-intensive background jobs, shifting them to off-peak hours will stretch your session limits further. 7:45 PM - 26 Mar 2026 980 18 网友解答:--【壹】--:
何意味?有点没太明白,就是说还是利好东半球呗?
--【贰】--:
太坏了!
--【叁】--:
只能说 免费的用的挺好 我真不该 充 pro 的 刚充了就这事情
--【肆】--:
果然不当人,名副其实
问题描述:
x.com
x.com
--【壹】--:
--【贰】--:
--【叁】--:
--【肆】--:
宕机也就算了,还砍额度有点过分了
Thariq
@trq212 Overall weekly limits stay the same, just how they're distributed across the week is changing. I know this was frustrating. We’re continuing to invest in scaling efficiently. I'll keep you posted on progress. 7:45 PM - 26 Mar 2026 890 11Thariq
@trq212 We've landed a lot of efficiency wins to offset this, but ~7% of users will hit session limits they wouldn't have before, particularly for pro tiers. If you run token-intensive background jobs, shifting them to off-peak hours will stretch your session limits further. 7:45 PM - 26 Mar 2026 980 18 网友解答:--【壹】--:
何意味?有点没太明白,就是说还是利好东半球呗?
--【贰】--:
太坏了!
--【叁】--:
只能说 免费的用的挺好 我真不该 充 pro 的 刚充了就这事情
--【肆】--:
果然不当人,名副其实

