A骚操作又来～～～砍额度？？？
- 内容介绍
- 文章标签
- 相关推荐
问题描述：
x.com
x.com
--【壹】--：
--【贰】--：
--【叁】--：
--【肆】--：
宕机也就算了，还砍额度有点过分了
Thariq
@trq212 Overall weekly limits stay the same, just how they're distributed across the week is changing. I know this was frustrating. We’re continuing to invest in scaling efficiently. I'll keep you posted on progress. 7:45 PM - 26 Mar 2026 890 11Thariq
@trq212 We've landed a lot of efficiency wins to offset this, but ~7% of users will hit session limits they wouldn't have before, particularly for pro tiers. If you run token-intensive background jobs, shifting them to off-peak hours will stretch your session limits further. 7:45 PM - 26 Mar 2026 980 18 网友解答：--【壹】--：
何意味？有点没太明白，就是说还是利好东半球呗？
--【贰】--：
太坏了！
--【叁】--：
只能说 免费的用的挺好 我真不该 充 pro 的 刚充了就这事情
--【肆】--：
果然不当人，名副其实
问题描述：
x.com
x.com
--【壹】--：
--【贰】--：
--【叁】--：
--【肆】--：
宕机也就算了，还砍额度有点过分了
Thariq
@trq212 Overall weekly limits stay the same, just how they're distributed across the week is changing. I know this was frustrating. We’re continuing to invest in scaling efficiently. I'll keep you posted on progress. 7:45 PM - 26 Mar 2026 890 11Thariq
@trq212 We've landed a lot of efficiency wins to offset this, but ~7% of users will hit session limits they wouldn't have before, particularly for pro tiers. If you run token-intensive background jobs, shifting them to off-peak hours will stretch your session limits further. 7:45 PM - 26 Mar 2026 980 18 网友解答：--【壹】--：
何意味？有点没太明白，就是说还是利好东半球呗？
--【贰】--：
太坏了！
--【叁】--：
只能说 免费的用的挺好 我真不该 充 pro 的 刚充了就这事情
--【肆】--：
果然不当人，名副其实